Kachikwu v. Grigsby ( 1996 )

USCA1 Opinion

          July 23, 1996         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                                 ____________________





        No. 96-1265







                                  ANTHONY KACHIKWU,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                             CHARLES T. GRIGSBY, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ___________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                  [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

                                   Circuit Judges.
______________



                                 ____________________



            Anthony Kachikwu on brief pro se.
________________

            Merita  A.  Hopkins,  Corporation  Counsel,  and  Dawna  McIntyre,
___________________                               _______________

        Assistant Corporation Counsel, City of Boston Law Department, on brief

        for appellees.





                                 ____________________





                                 ____________________



































                      Per Curiam.  Upon careful review  of the record and
__________



            the parties'  briefs, we  conclude that summary  judgment for



            the  defendant  was proper  for  the  reasons stated  by  the



            district court.  We add only the following comments.



                      Defendant's  discovery responses do  not suggest to



            us any grounds for reversing the judgment here.



                      We cannot consider the  judgment entered in another



            action against other defendants, as that matter is not before



            us now.



                      We know  of no  basis for plaintiff's  request that



            this case be transferred to state court.



                      Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
________   ___



























































                                         -2-