United States v. Cole ( 1996 )

USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 95-1948



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                                ARMONDO JOHNTEL COLE,



                                Defendant, Appellant.





                                 ____________________



                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE



                     [Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]
___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                               Selya, Boudin and Lynch,

                                   Circuit Judges.
______________



                                 ____________________



            R. Scott Miller, Jr. on brief for appellant.
____________________

            Jay P. McCloskey, United States  Attorney, George T.  Dilworth and
________________                           ___________________

        Helene  Kazanjian, Assistant  United  States Attorneys,  on brief  for
_________________

        appellee.





                                 ____________________



                                   December 2, 1996

                                 ____________________



































                 Per Curiam.   We have carefully  reviewed the record  in
__________



            this case, including the briefs of the parties.  We find that



            the evidence presented was  clearly sufficient for a rational



            jury to have found Cole guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of



            each count in the indictment.



                 Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
________   ___



















































































                                         -2-