Cook v. Heavey ( 1996 )

USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 96-1606



                                     ROBERT COOK,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                               MICHAEL HEAVEY, ET AL.,



                                Defendant, Appellees.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                               Selya, Boudin and Lynch,

                                   Circuit Judges.
______________



                                 ____________________



            Robert Cook on brief pro se.
___________

            Joslin Ham Murphy on brief for appellees, Town defendants.
_________________

            Scott  Harshbarger, Attorney  General,  and William  J.  Duensing,
__________________                          _____________________

        Assistant Attorney  General, Criminal Bureau, on  brief for appellees,

        State defendants.





                                 ____________________



                                  December 23, 1996

                                 ____________________

































                      Per  Curiam.     Plaintiff-appellant  appeals   the
___________



            dismissal  of his  second  amended complaint  for failure  to



            state a claim.   Reviewing  the dismissal de  novo, and  upon
__  ____



            consideration of the parties' briefs and the record, we agree



            with the district court's  analysis and affirm  substantially



            for  the  reasons  set   forth  in  Judge  Keeton's  thorough



            memorandum  order.  There was  no abuse of  discretion in the



            court's decision to  dismiss the complaint without  affording



            plaintiff another opportunity to amend.



                      Affirmed.
________



































































                                         -2-