Zaki v. Mutual of NY ( 1997 )


Menu:
  • USCA1 Opinion


          [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
    
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the First Circuit


    No. 97-2053

    THE GREAT WEST-LIFE ASSURANCE, ET AL.,
    Plaintiffs, Appellees,

    v.

    OMAR S. ZAKI,
    Defendant, Appellant.



    No. 97-2054

    OMAR S. ZAKI,
    Plaintiff, Appellant,

    v.

    MUTUAL OF NEW YORK,
    Defendant, Appellee.



    No. 97-2057

    UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.,
    Plaintiff, Appellee,

    v.

    OMAR S. ZAKI, M.D., P.C.,
    Defendant, Appellant.



    No. 97-2058

    CROWN LIFE INSURANCE, ET AL.,
    Plaintiff, Appellee,

    v.

    OMAR S. ZAKI, M.D.,
    Defendant, Appellant.



    No. 97-2059

    CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.,
    Plaintiff, Appellee,

    v.

    OMAR S. ZAKI,
    Defendant, Appellant.



    No. 97-2060

    LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.,
    Plaintiff, Appellee,

    v.

    OMAR S. ZAKI,
    Defendant, Appellant.



    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge]



    Before

    Boudin, Circuit Judge,
    Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge,
    and Lynch, Circuit Judge.



    Omar S. Zaki on brief pro se.
    Charles B. Straus, III, BBO, Joseph M. Hamilton, BBO and
    Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, on brief for appellee The
    Greeat-West Life Assurance Company.
    Joseph F. Ryan, BBO and Lyne, Woodworth & Evarts LLP, on brief
    for appellee Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York.
    Philip M. Howe, BBO and Lecomte, Emanuelson, Montejunas &
    Doyle on brief for appellees The Lincoln National Life Insurance
    Company, Union Central Life Insurance Company and Crown Life
    Insurance Company, by its Administrator Lone Star Life Insurance
    Company.




    Mark C. Rosenthal, BBO and Day, Berry and Howard on brief for
    appellee Connecticut General Life Insurance Company.





    July 21, 1998













































    Per Curiam. Omar S. Zaki appeals from summary
    judgments entered in favor of six insurance companies and
    dismissing Zaki's counterclaims. Each insurer was granted
    rescission of one or more disability insurance policies issued
    to Zaki and, as applicable, Zaki was ordered to repay the
    benefits which he received (less premiums paid) under the
    policies. Having carefully reviewed the judgments in light of
    the extensive briefs and the record, we share the district
    court's well-reasoned view that there was no genuine issue of
    material fact and that each insurer was entitled to judgment as
    a matter of law. The court did not misapply state law, nor did
    it misinterpret Zaki's waiver of the policies' incontestability
    clauses. There was no relevant factual dispute as to Zaki's
    intent.
    Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-2053

Filed Date: 10/20/1997

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2015