G. v. Cranston School ( 1997 )


Menu:
  • USCA1 Opinion






    United States Court of Appeals
    For the First Circuit
    ____________________

    No. 97-1785

    KEVIN G., A MINOR,
    BY JO-ANN AND ROBERT G., HIS PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS,

    Plaintiffs, Appellants,

    v.

    CRANSTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE AND KATHLEEN F. DELUCA
    IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS TREASURER FOR THE CITY OF CRANSTON,

    Defendants, Appellees.

    ____________________

    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

    [Hon. Francis J. Boyle, U.S. District Judge]

    ____________________

    Before

    Stahl, Circuit Judge,

    Aldrich and Coffin, Senior Circuit Judges.

    ____________________


    Richard J. Savage for appellants.
    William F. Holt, Assistant City Solicitor, for appellees.

    ____________________

    November 17, 1997
    ____________________











    -1-





    Per Curiam. Kevin G. is an eleven year-old boy who suffers

    from several medical conditions, including respiratory problems

    requiring use of a tracheal tube for breathing. He appeals the

    decision by the Cranston school district, upheld by the district

    court, to place him in the Gladstone school rather than his

    neighborhood school, the Waterman school. We affirm.

    Kevin G.'s medical conditions require that he receive medical

    care at school, including a full-time nurse. Gladstone is the only

    elementary school in the Cranston school district with a full-time

    nurse. Kevin G. acknowledges this, but argues that the school

    district has the responsibility to move a nurse teacher to

    Waterman. In a thorough opinion, the district court explained that

    while the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("the Act"),

    20 U.S.C. SS 1411-1415, requires the school district to provide a

    free appropriate education for children with disabilities, it does

    not require optimal results. See Kevin G. by Jo-Ann G. v. Cranston

    School Committee, 965 F. Supp. 261 (D. R.I. 1997). Thus, while it

    may be preferable for Kevin G. to attend a school located minutes

    from his home, placement in Gladstone satisfies the Act.

    Gladstone, which is located only three miles from Kevin G.'s home,

    meets all his educational and medical requirements. The school

    district has an obligation to provide a school placement which

    includes a nurse on duty full-time, but it is not required to

    change the district's placement of nurses when, as in this case,

    care is readily available at another easily accessible school.




    -2-




    Accordingly, we agree with the district court that the

    Gladstone placement satisfies the requirements of the Act.

    Affirmed.



    .













































    -3-

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-1785

Filed Date: 11/18/1997

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/21/2015