Macfarlane v. Smith ( 1997 )

USCA1 Opinion

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 97-1542



                                  JAMES MACFARLANE,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                                 PETER SMITH, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.

                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE



                   [Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge]
__________________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                 Selya, Circuit Judge,
_____________

                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
____________________

                              and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
_____________



                                 ____________________



            James MacFarlane on brief pro se.
________________

            Philip T.  McLaughlin, Attorney  General,  and  Daniel J.  Mullen,
_____________________                           _________________

        Senior Assistant Attorney General, Civil Bureau, on brief for appellee

        Peter Smith.

            Cynthia  L. Fallon  and Law  Office of  Rodney  L. Stark,  P.A. on
__________________      _______________________________________

        brief for appellee Jack P. Crisp, Jr.

            Diane  M.  Gorrow and  Soule,  Leslie,  Kidder, Zelin,  Sayward  &
_________________      ___________________________________________

        Loughman on brief for appellee Beryl Rich.
________





                                 ____________________



                                  November 10, 1997

                                 ____________________



























                      Per  Curiam.   James  MacFarlane  appeals from  the
___________



            dismissal of his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for



            failure to  state a claim  upon which relief may  be granted.



            Having  carefully reviewed  the  record, "it  clearly appears



            that,  on the facts alleged, the  plaintiff cannot recover on



            any viable  theory." Wagner v.  Devine, 122 F.3d 53,  55 (1st
______     ______



            Cir.   1997).    We  affirm  the  dismissal  of  MacFarlane's
______



            complaint  essentially for the reasons stated in the district



            court's Orders dated November 27, 1996 and March 27, 1997.







































































                                         -2-