United States v. Moon ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                United States Court of Appeals
    For the First Circuit
    ______________________________
    No. 13-2352
    UNITED STATES,
    Appellee,
    v.
    TERRANCE MOON,
    Defendant, Appellant.
    _________________________
    Before
    Howard, Chief Judge,
    Souter, Associate Justice,*
    Torruella, Selya, Lynch, Lipez, Thompson, Kayatta and Barron,
    Circuit Judges.
    ________________________
    ORDER OF COURT
    Entered:    May 16, 2016
    The petition for rehearing having been denied by the panel of judges who decided the case,
    and the petition for rehearing en banc having been submitted to the active judges of this court and
    a majority of the judges not having voted that the case be heard en banc, it is ordered that the
    petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc be denied.
    * Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States,
    sitting by designation.
    TORRUELLA and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, dissenting from denial of en
    banc rehearing.
    LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, joined by TORRUELLA and THOMPSON, Circuit
    Judges, Statement Re Denial of En Banc Review.            I am disappointed that a majority of the
    active judges have rejected the opportunity presented by this case to reconsider en banc our
    aberrant and misguided law on the admission of opinion testimony by police officers.        In my
    concurrence four years ago in United States v. Valdivia, I pointed out that our approach has
    "created in some of our precedents an unwarranted police exception from the requirements
    applicable to expert testimony."      
    680 F.3d 33
    , 61 (1st Cir. 2012).     That approach not only
    seriously misconstrues Federal Rules of Evidence 701 and 702, but it is also "at odds with [the law
    of] virtually every other circuit."   United States v. Moon, 
    802 F.3d 135
    , 147 n.9 (1st Cir. 2015)
    (citing 
    Valdivia, 680 F.3d at 56
    n.16 (collecting cases)).   It is now well past the time when we
    should have confronted our flawed law and eliminated the ongoing unfairness to defendants
    By the Court:
    /s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk
    cc:
    Hon. Denise Jefferson Casper
    Robert Farrell, Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
    Mark T. Quinlivan
    Dina Michael Chaitowitz
    Robert Edward Richardson
    Eric Paul Christofferson
    Derege B. Demissie
    Terrance Moon
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-2352O

Judges: Howard, Kayatta, Lipez, Lynch, Selya, Souter, Thompson, Torruella

Filed Date: 5/16/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024