Smith-Barney, Inc. v. Teitler ( 1997 )

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-1009
SMITH-BARNEY, INC.,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
URSULA EKINCI,
Defendant, Appellee.
STANLEY A. TEITLER, P.C.,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Boudin, Circuit Judge.
Stanley A. Teitler, Stanley A. Teitler, P.C. and Scott Goldstein
on brief for appellant Stanley A. Teitler, P.C.
Andrew M. Horton and Verrill & Dana on brief for appellee Smith
Barney, Inc.
Douglas F. Jennings on brief for appellee Ursula Ekinci.
JUNE 18, 1997
Per Curiam. Upon careful consideration of the parties'
briefs and the record, we find appellant's contentions to be
without merit. The district court's order correctly
explained the validity and priority of the competing claims.
Smith Barney, Inc. v. Ekinci, 937 F.Supp. 59 (D. Me. 1996).
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-