Mount v. United States ( 1993 )

July 1, 1993
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 93-1120
CHARLES MERRILL MOUNT,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Charles Merrill Mount on brief pro so.
A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Tobin N. Harvey,
Assistant United States Attorney, on Memorandum in Support of Motion
for Summary Disposition for appellee.
Per Curiam. In this most recent challenge to his
1988 conviction for interstate transportation of stolen
property (one of a series of such challenges he has brought
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255), petitioner alleges that the
evidence was insufficient to support the jury's finding of
guilt. In particular, he contends that the testimony of two
government witnesses was unworthy of credence. In our
decision on direct appeal, we discussed such testimony at
some length and found that the jury was justified in relying
thereon. See United States v. Mount, 896 F.2d 612, 616-20
(1st Cir. 1990). The arguments now advanced by petitioner,
even if not procedurally barred, provide no basis for
revisiting this issue.
Affirmed.