Deary v. Mitrano ( 1999 )

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 99-1375
ARNOLD N. DEARY,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CATHERINE C. MITRANO,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Stahl and Lipez, Circuit Judges.
Arnold N. Deary on brief pro se.
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and J. Mitch
MacDonald, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.
December 9, 1999
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs
and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment below. The
appellee is absolutely immune from suit for claims arising from
her role in prosecuting the administrative action. Butz v.
Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 516-517 (1978); Wang v. New Hampshire
Board of Registration in Medicine, 55 F.3d 698, 701 (1st Cir.
1995).
The district court did not have subject matter
jurisdiction to review an order of the Federal Aviation
Administration. 49 U.S.C. 46110. Review may only be
obtained by filing a petition for review in this court within
sixty days of the order, unless reasonable grounds are given
for delay. 49 U.S.C. 46110(a).
Affirmed. Loc.R. 27.1.