Bevill v. Sprint Communication ( 2006 )

Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter
Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 05-1704
ROBERT T. BEVILL,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Chief Judge,
Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
Robert T. Bevill on brief pro se.
R. Matthew Cairns and Ransmeier & Spellman, P.C. and Mark D.
Hinderks and Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP on brief for appellee.
January 5, 2006
Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs and record
on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Among
other problems, the appellant has no standing to litigate claims
that belong to a corporation. Moreover, he has no right to
litigate claims in this circuit that are integral to a suit already
filed elsewhere, and he makes no showing that the actions are
distinct. See, e.g., Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153-
154 (1979)(describing the deleterious effects of repetitive suits);
Congress Credit Corp. v. AJC Intern., Inc., 42 F.3d 686, 689 (1st
Cir. 1994)(repetitive actions may be dismissed); Gonzalez v. Banco
Cent. Corp., 27 F.3d 751, 275-6 (1st Cir. 1994).
Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).
-2-