Smith v. Aroostook County ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •            United States Court of Appeals
    For the First Circuit
    No. 19-1340
    BRENDA SMITH
    Plaintiff, Appellee,
    v.
    AROOSTOOK COUNTY; SHAWN D. GILLEN, in his official
    capacity as Sheriff of Aroostook County
    Defendants, Appellants.
    APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
    [Hon. Nancy Torresen, Chief U.S. District Judge]
    Before
    Howard, Chief Judge,
    Lynch and Kayatta, Circuit Judges.
    Peter T. Marchesi, Cassandra S. Shaffer, and Wheeler & Arey,
    P.A., on brief for appellants.
    Zachary L. Heiden, Emma E. Bond, ACLU of Maine Foundation,
    Peter Mancuso, Andrew Schmidt Law PLLC, David A. Soley, James G.
    Monteleone, and Bernstein Shur, on brief for appellees.
    April 30, 2019
    Per curiam.        In considering the defendants' appeal of
    a preliminary injunction entered by the district court, we will
    set aside the ruling only if the court clearly erred in assessing
    the   facts,    misapprehended        the applicable legal       principles,      or
    otherwise is shown to have abused its discretion.                     See Wine and
    Spirits Retailers, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 
    418 F.3d 36
    , 46 (1st Cir.
    2005).
    Brenda Smith receives a twice daily dose of buprenorphine
    prescribed     by    her    doctor    as     treatment   for   what    her   doctor
    classifies     as   an     opioid    use    disorder.    Smith   is    due   to   be
    incarcerated for forty days at the Aroostook County Jail.                     Jail
    officials informed her counsel that she would not receive her
    medication while incarcerated.             Her physician opines without serious
    contradiction that prior efforts to take Smith off her medication
    have not been successful and that her medication is necessary
    to her continued health; he and other witnesses opine that, given
    her   medical       history,    forced       and   immediate   withdrawal     from
    buprenorphine will cause her painful symptoms and increase her
    risk of relapse, overdose, and death.               She therefore brought this
    suit seeking, among other things, injunctive relief compelling the
    defendants to provide her medication while she is incarcerated.
    Defendants replied, in part, that whether she receives the medication
    will depend on a case-by-case medical assessment.                      Defendants,
    though, do not actually plan to obtain such an assessment from a
    - 2 -
    qualified doctor prior to incarcerating Smith.
    On this preliminary record, the district court considered
    the likelihood of Smith prevailing on a claim for discrimination
    under     Title    II    of     the   Americans       with   Disabilities      Act,
    42   U.S.C.       § 12132; the potential for irreparable harm;                the
    balance     of     harms;       and   the    public    interest.        Noting that
    defendants'       own   submissions     tout    the    variety     of    reasonable
    alternatives      at    their    disposal    for   providing     Smith with her
    medication in a manner that alleviates any security concerns, the
    district court found a sufficient likelihood of success combined
    with both a strong balance of harms and a public interest in favor
    of Smith so as to warrant a preliminary injunction ordering the
    jail to provide Smith with her medication as prescribed while she
    is incarcerated.
    We previously denied the defendants' request for a stay
    of the district court's order.              Now we address the merits of the
    defendants' appeal of that order.
    Having carefully considered the record and the parties'
    briefs, we find no abuse of discretion by the district court in
    its preliminary assessment of the issues that must be balanced in
    deciding a request for preliminary injunctive relief.
    The preliminary injunction is affirmed.                The motions of
    the American Medical Association, American Society for Addiction
    - 3 -
    Medicine,   Maine     Medical   Association,       Connecticut   Society   for
    Addiction   Medicine,     Connecticut      State    Medical   Society,   Maine
    Association    of     Psychiatric    Physicians,     Massachusetts     Medical
    Society, Massachusetts Society of Addiction Medicine, New Hampshire
    Medical    Society,    Northern     New   England   Society    for   Addiction
    Medicine, Rhode Island Medical Society, Rhode Island Society for
    Addiction Medicine, Vermont Medical Society, Joshua M. Sharfstein,
    Brendan Saloner, Colleen Barry, Noa Krawczyk, Jenny Wen, and Jia
    Ahmad for leave to file amicus briefs on behalf of Smith are denied
    as moot.
    - 4 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1340P

Judges: Howard, Lynch, Kayatta

Filed Date: 4/30/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024