United States v. Crane ( 2002 )

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 01-1431
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
SUSAN S. CRANE,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Selya and Lynch,
Circuit Judges.
Susan S. Crane on brief pro se.
Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, and Margaret D.
McGaughey, Appellate Chief, on brief for appellee.
December 27, 2001
Per Curiam. Pro se defendant Susan Crane appeals
a district court judgment that revoked her supervised
release and sentenced her to an additional term of
imprisonment. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the
parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the district
court did not clearly err in finding that Crane violated the
three conditions of her supervised release. Further, the
court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Crane's
supervised release term and imposing another term of
imprisonment. The arguments that Crane makes to the
contrary are either waived because she did not raise them
below or patently meritless. See, e.g., United States v.
Maxwell, 254 F.3d 21, 25-30 (1 st Cir. 2001). Accordingly,
the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local
Rule 27(c).
-2-