Heon v. Vose, Jr. ( 1996 )

USCA1 Opinion

          May 24, 1996

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                                 ____________________





        No. 95-2137



                               FREDERICK M. HEON, JR.,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                             GEORGE A. VOSE, JR., ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND



                       [Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge]
___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________

                           Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
______________



                                 ____________________



            Frederick M. Heon, Jr. on brief pro se.
______________________

            Michael B.  Grant, Senior Legal  Counsel, Rhode Island  Department
_________________

        of Corrections, on brief for appellees.





                                 ____________________





                                 ____________________









                      Per  Curiam.     Frederick   Heon,   Jr.,  who   is
___________





























            incarcerated at the Adult Correctional  Institutions in Rhode



            Island, appeals  from the  district court's dismissal  of his



            civil  rights suit  under 42  U.S.C.    1983 against  various



            state  prison officials.    We affirm  substantially for  the



            reasons given in the magistrate judge's report dated July 12,



            1995,  which the district court adopted as its decision.  See
___



            also  Dominique v. Weld,  73 F.3d 1156  (1st Cir. 1996).   We
____  _________    ____



            have considered Heon's claims of error, but find none of them



            persuasive.



                      Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.
____________________________



































































                                         -2-