United States v. Rodriguez-Porras ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                                                                        FILED
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    December 15, 2009
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    Clerk of Court
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,                      No. 09-1099
    v.                                                    (D. Colorado)
    GILBERTO RODRIGUEZ-PORRAS,                  (D.C. No. 1:08-CR-00394-WYD-1)
    a/k/a Juan Carlos Nevarez-Garcia,
    a/k/a Manuel Martinez-Porras, a/k/a
    Miguel Mendez, a/k/a Luis Serrano,
    a/k/a Juan Carlos Nevarez, a/k/a
    Gilberto Rodriguez,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before HARTZ, SEYMOUR, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
    On December 11, 2008, Gilberto Rodriguez-Porras pleaded guilty in the
    United States District Court for the District of Colorado to one count of
    reentering the country after having been previously deported following conviction
    *
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously to honor the party’s request for a decision on the briefs without oral
    argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore
    ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding
    precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and
    collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent
    with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
    of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b)(2). The district court
    sentenced him to 64 months’ imprisonment, and he appealed. Finding no
    meritorious issues for appeal, his counsel has submitted an Anders brief and a
    motion for leave to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967).
    Counsel provided Mr. Rodriguez-Porras with a copy of the brief, but
    Mr. Rodriguez-Porras has filed no response with this court. We have jurisdiction
    under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
    Counsel’s Anders brief fully and accurately addresses the issues, and we
    agree with counsel that there are no meritorious issues for appeal.
    We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and DISMISS the appeal.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    Harris L Hartz
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-1099

Judges: Hartz, Seymour, Ebel

Filed Date: 12/15/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024