United States v. McAllister , 487 F. App'x 472 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                              FILED
    United States Court of Appeals
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS       Tenth Circuit
    FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                     December 5, 2012
    Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    Clerk of Court
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.                                                       No. 12-1387
    (D.C. No. 1:11-CR-00283-PAB-1)
    ROBERT T. MCALLISTER,                                      (D. Colo.)
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
    Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, KELLY and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.
    This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the
    appeal waiver contained in defendant Robert T. McAllister’s plea agreement. The
    defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud. Pursuant to the plea agreement,
    McAllister waived his right to appeal his conviction or sentence, provided the
    sentence was within the statutory maximum authorized by law and did not upwardly
    *
    This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the
    determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The
    case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment
    is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
    and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent
    with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
    depart from the sentencing guideline range. The district court sentenced McAllister
    to 78 months’ imprisonment, the low end of the guideline range. Nevertheless,
    McAllister filed a notice of appeal.
    The government filed its motion to enforce the plea agreement pursuant to
    United States v. Hahn, 
    359 F.3d 1315
     (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).
    McAllister has chosen not to file a response.
    We have reviewed the motion and the record, and agree that McAllister’s
    proposed appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, that he knowingly and
    voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and that enforcing the waiver would not result
    in a miscarriage of justice. See 
    id. at 1325
     (describing the factors this court considers
    when determining whether to enforce a waiver of appellate rights).
    Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to enforce the plea agreement and
    DISMISS the appeal.
    Entered for the Court
    Per Curiam
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-1387

Citation Numbers: 487 F. App'x 472

Judges: Briscoe, Kelly, Hartz

Filed Date: 12/5/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024