United States v. Real Property Located at 3347 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                                                          FILED
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 29, 2019
    Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    TENTH CIRCUIT                        Clerk of Court
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.                                                     No. 18-6129
    (D.C. No. 5:16-CV-00153-HE)
    REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT                                W.D. Okla.
    3347 CHARTREUSE WAY,
    HOUSTON, TEXAS,
    Defendant,
    ________________________
    FABROSE COMPANY NIGERIA,
    LTD., doing business as Fabross
    Property Ventures,
    Claimant,
    ________________________
    ALEXANDER EZEAH,
    Movant - Appellant.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before BACHARACH, MURPHY, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the
    doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
    however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th
    Cir. R. 32.1.
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination
    of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
    therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
    Alexander Ezeah is the registered agent of appellant, Fabrose Company
    Nigeria, Ltd., d/b/a Fabross Property Ventures (“Fabross”). On February 18, 2016,
    the United States commenced a civil in rem forfeiture action against property
    owned by Fabross located at 3347 Chartreuse Way, Houston, Texas. The claim
    Fabross filed in the civil forfeiture matter was stricken by the district court when
    Fabross failed to comply with an order of the court. Judgment was thereafter
    entered in favor of the United States on June 20, 2018.
    Both the notice of appeal and the opening brief in this matter were signed
    by Ezeah, who is not an attorney. “It has been the law for the better part of two
    centuries . . . that a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through
    licensed counsel.” Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 
    506 U.S. 194
    , 201-02 (1993).
    Because Ezeah cannot represent Fabross in this appeal, it is dismissed.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    Michael R. Murphy
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-6129

Filed Date: 3/29/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021