Morgan v. Tulsa County ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                                                                           F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    OCT 9 1997
    FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    JOHN MORGAN,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.                                                    No. 96-5243
    (D.C. No. 96-CV-748-BU)
    TULSA COUNTY, Oklahoma,                               (N.D. Okla.)
    Respondent-Appellee.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before KELLY, McKAY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
    this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore
    ordered submitted without oral argument.
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
    doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
    generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
    and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    Petitioner filed this action under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
    , seeking habeas corpus
    relief. Petitioner was convicted in Oklahoma state court after a retrial; another
    trial on separate charges was scheduled for January, 1997. The district court
    dismissed the habeas action, without prejudice, because petitioner had not
    exhausted his available state remedies by presenting his claims to the Oklahoma
    Court of Criminal Appeals. We AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal without
    prejudice. See Coleman v. Thompson, 
    501 U.S. 722
    , 731 (1991). The application
    for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and the portion of the district court’s
    order of September 5, 1996, ordering partial payment of fees is VACATED. 1
    Entered for the Court
    Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
    Circuit Judge
    1
    This court held in United States v. Simmonds, 
    111 F.3d 737
    , 743 (10th Cir.
    1997), that the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, which amended 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    ,
    does not apply to habeas actions. We, therefore, vacate that portion of the district
    court’s order that ordered partial fee payment in accordance with the amended
    § 1915.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-5243

Filed Date: 10/9/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021