United States v. Rojas-Alvarado ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                              FILED
    United States Court of Appeals
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS       Tenth Circuit
    FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                       February 6, 2014
    Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    Clerk of Court
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.                                                         No. 13-1412
    (D.C. No. 1:12-CR-00420-MSK-1)
    JESUS ROJAS-ALVARADO,                                       (D. Colo.)
    a/k/a “Santos Acevedo-Flores,”
    a/k/a “Chuy,”
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
    Before TYMKOVICH, O’BRIEN, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.
    After entering into a plea agreement that included a waiver of his right to
    appeal, Jesus Rojas-Alvarado pleaded guilty to three counts: one count of conspiracy
    to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of 500 grams or more of a mixture
    or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, in violation of
    *
    This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the
    determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The
    case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment
    is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
    and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent
    with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
    21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846; one count of possession with intent to
    distribute 500 grams or more of a quantity of a mixture and substance containing a
    detectable amount of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and
    (b)(1)(A); and one count of possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking
    crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). The district court imposed a
    sentence of 180 months’ imprisonment for the drug counts and a consecutive
    sentence of 60 months’ imprisonment on the gun count. Mr. Rojas-Alvarado
    appealed. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under United
    States v. Hahn, 
    359 F.3d 1315
    , 1325, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam).
    Hahn sets forth three factors to evaluate an appeal waiver: “(1) whether the
    disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether
    the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights; and (3) whether
    enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” 
    Id. at 1325.
    In
    response to the government’s motion, Mr. Rojas-Alvarado has not challenged the
    government’s analysis of any of these factors. Instead, through counsel, he has
    conceded that the appeal waiver is enforceable.
    We need not consider a Hahn factor that a defendant does not challenge.
    See United States v. Porter, 
    405 F.3d 1136
    , 1143 (10th Cir. 2005). Nevertheless, our
    independent review of the record confirms that each of the factors is satisfied. To the
    extent that Mr. Rojas-Alvarado wishes to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of
    counsel, as indicated by his docketing statement, he should do so in a collateral
    -2-
    proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See 
    Porter, 405 F.3d at 1144
    (“[A] defendant
    must generally raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a collateral
    proceeding, not on direct review. This rule applies even where a defendant seeks to
    invalidate an appellate waiver based on ineffective assistance of counsel.” (internal
    citation omitted)); 
    Hahn, 359 F.3d at 1327
    n.13 (noting it did not disturb the
    longstanding rule that ineffective assistance claims must generally be brought in
    collateral proceedings).
    The motion to enforce is granted and this matter is dismissed.
    Entered for the Court
    Per Curiam
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1412

Judges: Tymkovich, O'Brien, Holmes

Filed Date: 2/6/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024