United States v. Murillo , 598 F. App'x 601 ( 2015 )

FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 20, 2015
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 14-3272
(D.C. No. 2:12-CR-20153-CM-2)
KARLA MONROY MURILLO, (D. Kan.)
Defendant - Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, MATHESON and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.
The government moves to enforce the plea agreement, containing an appeal
waiver, it entered into with Karla Monroy Murillo. Ms. Monroy Murillo does not
oppose enforcement of the appeal waiver. Indeed, she requests that this court enforce
the plea agreement and appeal waiver and dismiss her appeal. After independently
considering the plea agreement and plea and sentencing hearing transcripts in light of
the three-prong analysis set forth in United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1325
*
This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the
determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The
case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment
is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent
with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
(10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam), we conclude that the motion to enforce
should be granted.
Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion to enforce and dismiss this
appeal.
Entered for the Court
Per Curiam
-2-