United States v. Moreno ( 2017 )

FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT August 28, 2017
_________________________________
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
No. 17-3077
v. (D.C. No. 2:13-CR-20079-CM-1)
(D. Kan.)
JESUS ENRIQUE MORENO,
Defendant - Appellant.
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
_________________________________
Before BRISCOE, HARTZ, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
Mr. Jesus Enrique Moreno was convicted of possession with intent to
distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a).
The sentence was 168 months of imprisonment and 2 years of supervised
release.
*
We conclude that oral argument would not materially help us to
decide this appeal. As a result, we are deciding the appeal based on the
briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
This order and judgment does not constitute binding precedent except
under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel.
But the order and judgment may be cited for its persuasive value under
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1(a) and 10th Cir. R. 32.1(A).
Mr. Moreno moved for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2), arguing that Amendment 782 to the sentencing guidelines had
lowered his base-offense level. The district court disagreed, determining
that Amendment 782 had not altered Mr. Moreno’s base-offense level.
Thus, the district court dismissed Mr. Moreno’s motion based on a lack of
jurisdiction. We affirm.
We review de novo the district court’s authority to reduce a sentence
under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Rhodes, 549 F.3d 833, 837 (10th Cir.
2008). Applying this standard, we consider whether Amendment 782
reduced Mr. Moreno’s applicable guideline range. United States v. Jordan,
853 F.3d 1334, 1342 (10th Cir. 2017). We answer “no.”
When arrested, Mr. Moreno possessed 6.605 kilograms of 100% pure
methamphetamine. Based on this weight, the district court used the
applicable drug-quantity tables to calculate Mr. Moreno’s base-offense
level of 38.
The table was later changed when the U.S. Sentencing Commission
enacted Amendment 782. But this change did not affect offenders like Mr.
Moreno who had been found responsible for 4.5 kilograms or more of
100% pure methamphetamine. These offenders remained subject to a base-
offense level of 38. See U.S. Sent. Guidelines § 201.1(c)(1); see also
United States v. Larsen, 664 F. App’x 751, 753 (10th Cir. 2016) (“After
the promulgation of Amendment 782, the base-offense level for an offense
-2-
involving 4.5 kilograms or more of methamphetamine (actual) was 38.”);
United States v. Rodriguez-Dimas, 651 F.App’x 819, 821 (10th Cir. 2016)
(stating that in Amendment 782, the Sentencing Commission retained a
base-offense level of 38 for offenses involving 4.5 kilograms or more of
actual methamphetamine). Mr. Moreno’s 6.605 kilograms of 100% pure
methamphetamine exceed the 4.5 kilogram threshold. Thus, his base-
offense level remained at 38 even after the adoption of Amendment 782.
Therefore, Mr. Moreno’s guideline range remained the same.
With no change in the guideline range, the district court was correct
in dismissing Mr. Moreno’s motion for a sentence reduction. Therefore, we
affirm.
Entered for the Court
Robert E. Bacharach
Circuit Judge
-3-