Davis v. United States ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    Filed 1/9/96
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    DANNY DAVIS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,                       No. 95-3320
    v.                                           (D.C. No. 95-CV-3385)
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;                                  (D. Kansas)
    ELIZABETH COLLINS, Assistant U.S.
    Attorney; and JANET RENO, United
    States Attorney General,
    Respondents - Appellees.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
    Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this
    appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered
    submitted without oral argument.
    This matter is before the court on appellant’s motion for leave to proceed on
    appeal without prepayment of costs or fees. In order to succeed on his motion, an
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
    law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
    citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
    the terms and conditions of the 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    appellant must show both a financial inability to pay the required filing fees and the
    existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the
    issues raised on appeal. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (a); Coppedge v. United States, 
    369 U.S. 438
     (1962); Ragan v. Cox, 
    305 F.2d 58
     (10th Cir. 1962).
    As the district court pointed out in its order, the appellant’s conviction was
    affirmed on direct appeal by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and his subsequent
    motion for relief under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
     was denied. For the reasons stated in the
    district court’s order dated September 29, 1995, the appellant makes no reasoned
    argument which would permit him to relitigate issues already raised. Accordingly, the
    motion for leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees is denied.
    The appeal is DISMISSED.
    The mandate shall issue forthwith.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    Stephen H. Anderson
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-3320

Filed Date: 1/9/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021