Ware v. Wyoming Board of Law ( 1998 )

F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
SEP 22 1998
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
CORINE WARE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. No. 97-8093
(D.C. No. 96-CV-299-J)
WYOMING BOARD OF LAW (D. Wyo.)
EXAMINERS, (973 F. Supp. 1339)
Defendant-Appellee.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore
ordered submitted without oral argument.
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court
generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the
District of Wyoming granting summary judgment to defendant and denying
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in her action alleging violations of the
Americans With Disabilities Act, certain civil rights statutes, and the
Constitution. See Ware v. Wyoming Bd. of Law Exam’rs , 973 F. Supp. 1339 (D.
Wyo. 1997). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
“We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo,
applying the same standard used by the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).”
Novell, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co. , 141 F.3d 983, 985 (10th Cir. 1998). Based on
our review of the record, we discern no error in the district court’s judgment. We
therefore affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its
order of August 5, 1997.
AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
Circuit Judge
-2-