United States v. Martin ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                                          F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    May 23, 2005
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,                    No. 04-1348
    v.                                            (D. Colorado)
    TERRELLE VINSON MARTIN,                          (D.C. No. 03-CR-252-D)
    Defendant - Appellant.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before SEYMOUR, HARTZ, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
    Defendant Terrelle Vinson Martin was convicted after a jury trial of
    unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).
    Because Defendant has multiple prior felony convictions, he was designated an
    armed career criminal. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). His resulting total offense level,
    33, and criminal history category, VI, yielded a guidelines range of 235-293
    *
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
    this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
    therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.   This order and judgment is
    not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,
    and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and
    judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and
    conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    months’ imprisonment. The district court sentenced Defendant to the 235-month
    minimum sentence.
    Before the sentencing hearing Defendant filed a motion arguing that in
    light of Blakely v. Washington, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
    (2004), the Sentencing Guidelines
    were unconstitutional. The district court denied the motion and Defendant
    appeals.
    While this matter was on appeal the United States Supreme Court handed
    down United States v. Booker, 
    125 S. Ct. 738
    (2005). The government concedes
    that United States v. Labastida-Segura, 
    396 F.3d 1140
    (10th Cir. 2005), requires
    Defendant’s case to be remanded for resentencing.
    We agree and REMAND to the district court for resentencing.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    Harris L Hartz
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-1348

Judges: Seymour, Hartz, McConnell

Filed Date: 5/23/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024