Schweitzer v. Schweitzer ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    SEP 3 1997
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    TENTH CIRCUIT                           PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    GEORGE L. SCHWEITZER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,                       No. 97-4053
    v.                                                   D. Utah
    DANIEL S. SCHWEITZER; HAZEL                         (D.C. No. 96-CV-850-S)
    E. WUNDROW HANNEMAN
    SCHWEITZER,
    Defendants - Appellees.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before ANDERSON, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
    this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34 (a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is
    therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
    law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
    citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
    the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    Plaintiff and appellant George L. Schweitzer, appearing pro se, appeals the
    dismissal of his First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, for failure
    to show entitlement to relief, and for failure to plead facts necessary to permit
    defendant and appellee Daniel S. Schweitzer to respond. We conclude that, for
    substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s order, entered on March
    28, 1997, the district court correctly dismissed this action.
    Daniel Schweitzer seeks an award of attorney’s fees and costs incurred on
    appeal, on the ground that the appeal is frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 38. An
    appeal is considered frivolous when “the result is obvious, or the appellant’s
    arguments are wholly without merit.” Braley v. Campbell, 
    832 F.2d 1504
    , 1510
    (10th Cir. 1987) (en banc). This appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, appellant
    George Schweitzer is ordered to show cause within 15 days why attorney’s fees
    and costs should not be assessed against him. See Doyle v. Oklahoma Bar Ass’n,
    
    998 F.2d 1559
    , 1571 (10th Cir. 1993).
    The appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    Stephen H. Anderson
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-4053

Filed Date: 9/3/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021