Williams v. Smelser ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                                                                           F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS
    October 17, 2006
    TENTH CIRCUIT                       Elisabeth A. Shumaker
    Clerk of Court
    RICK Y LA VINE W ILLIAM S,
    Petitioner-Appellant,                       No. 06-1126
    v.                                              (D.C. No. 05-cv-2402-ZLW )
    DICK SM ELSER, W arden of                                 (D . Colo.)
    C.C.C.F.; and THE A TTORNEY
    G EN ER AL O F TH E STA TE O F
    C OLO RA D O ,
    Respondents-Appellees.
    OR DER
    Before KELLY, M cKA Y, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.
    This is a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 prisoner appeal. The underlying petition
    for habeas corpus w as dismissed by the district court as untimely. Pursuant to
    provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the
    district court denied a certificate of appealability. The trial court’s thorough
    Order and Judgment of Dismissal, filed February 1, 2006, fully and correctly sets
    forth why it dismissed the petition. W e see no reason to repeat that effort.
    To obtain a certificate of appealability, Petitioner must make a “substantial
    showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).
    In order to meet this burden, Petitioner must demonstrate “that reasonable jurists
    could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have
    been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to
    deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v. M cDaniel, 
    529 U.S. 473
    ,
    484 (2000) (quotation omitted).
    W e have carefully reviewed Petitioner’s brief, the district court’s
    disposition, and the record on appeal. Nothing in the facts, the record on appeal,
    or Petitioner’s filing raises an issue which meets our standard for the grant of a
    certificate of appealability. For substantially the reasons set forth by the district
    court, we DEN Y Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability and
    DISM ISS the appeal. The petition to proceed in forma pauperis is GR ANTED .
    The M otion for Permission to File Amicus Curiae Brief is DENIED.
    Entered for the Court
    M onroe G. M cKay
    Circuit Judge
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-1126

Judges: Kelly, McKay, Lucero

Filed Date: 10/17/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024