Jackson v. Williams ( 2000 )

F I L E D
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
NOV 3 2000
TENTH CIRCUIT
__________________________ PATRICK FISHER
Clerk
RICHARD JACKSON, a/k/a Richard E.
Jackson,
Petitioner-Appellant,
No. 00-2267
v. (D. N.M.)
(D.Ct. No. CIV-00-897-BB/LFG)
JOE WILLIAMS, Warden, Lea County
Correctional Facility; GARY JOHNSON,
Governor, State of New Mexico;
ROBERT PERRY, Secretary of
Corrections; NEW MEXICO
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
State of New Mexico; WACKENHUT
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION, a
Florida Corporation; LEA COUNTY,
NEW MEXICO; ATTORNEY GENERAL
FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Respondents-Appellees.
____________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BRORBY, KELLY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is
therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant Richard Jackson, a state inmate appearing pro se, appeals the
district court’s decision denying his habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 for failure to exhaust existing state remedies. The facts and issues in this
case are identical to those in Rael v. Williams, 223 F.3d 1153 (10th Cir. 2000),
petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Oct. 10, 2000) (No. 00-6587). Thus, our decision is
governed by this court’s analysis and conclusions therein. Accordingly, we grant
Mr. Jackson a certificate of appealability and AFFIRM the judgment of the
district court, as modified, to dismiss the claim cognizable under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 with prejudice; all other claims contained in Mr. Jackson’s petition are
dismissed without prejudice.
Entered by the Court:
WADE BRORBY
United States Circuit Judge
-2-