Hakeem Muhammad v. Pugh ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                                                                         F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    MAY 23 2003
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM
    MUHAMMAD, also known as
    Christopher Hijrah Mitchell,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    No. 03-1034
    v.
    (District of Colorado)
    (D.C. No. 02-Z-1465)
    M. V. PUGH, ADX-Warden; ADX-
    MAILROOM INMATE SYSTEMS
    MANAGER-OFFICERS; K. HAWK-
    SAWYER, BOP - Director; BOP,
    Office of Information and Privacy, et
    al.; ADX-STEP-DOWN UNIT
    SCREENING COMMITTEE, Unit
    Operations (Programs); ADX-
    ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY
    COORDINATOR; BCP-NCRO
    ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY
    COORDINATOR; BOP-CENTRAL
    OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE
    REMEDY COORDINATOR,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
    doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court
    generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order
    and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    Before SEYMOUR, MURPHY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
    After examining appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this court has
    determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the
    determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).
    The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
    Appellant Eli-Jah Hakeem Muhammad, a federal prisoner incarcerated in
    Colorado, filed a pro se complaint asserting violations of his federal civil rights.
    The district court granted Muhammad’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and
    ordered Muhammad to pay an initial partial filing fee of $19.00 or show cause
    why he had no means by which to pay the initial fee. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1915
    (b)(1).
    Muhammad was specifically directed that to show cause he was required to file a
    current certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement. He was also
    warned that his complaint would be dismissed if he failed to either pay the initial
    partial filing fee or show cause within thirty days. Muhammad did not pay the
    partial filing fee or provide the current trust fund account statement.
    Consequently, the district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice.
    Muhammad then brought this appeal.
    In its order dismissing Muhammad’s complaint without prejudice, the
    district court set out at length the numerous opportunities Muhammad was given
    -2-
    to file a certified trust fund account statement. Although a certified copy of his
    prison trust fund account statement is attached to the motion to proceed in forma
    pauperis Muhammad has filed with this court, Muhammad does not provide a
    comprehensible explanation for his failure to provide a copy of his trust fund
    account statement to the district court pursuant to that court’s order. Accordingly,
    this court affirms the district court’s dismissal of Muhammad’s complaint
    without prejudice. Muhammad’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal
    is granted. Muhammad is reminded that he remains obligated to continue making
    partial payments until his appellate filing fee is paid in full. See 
    id.
     § 1915(b).
    ENTERED FOR THE COURT
    Michael R. Murphy
    Circuit Judge
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-1034

Judges: Seymour, Murphy, O'Brien

Filed Date: 5/23/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024