Bailes v. Booker ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               F I L E D
    United States Court of Appeals
    Tenth Circuit
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    OCT 10 1997
    TENTH CIRCUIT
    PATRICK FISHER
    Clerk
    GEORGE BAILES, III,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.                                          No. 97-1144
    (D.C. No. 96-B-2024)
    J.W. BOOKER, Warden,                                        (D. Colo.)
    Respondent-Appellee.
    ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
    Before ANDERSON, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
    After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined
    unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of
    this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is
    ordered submitted without oral argument.
    Petitioner George Bailes, III, a federal inmate appearing pro se, appeals the
    district court's order dismissing his petition for habeas relief under 
    28 U.S.C. § 2241
    . We affirm. Bailes contends he should receive pretrial confinement credit
    *
    This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
    law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the
    citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under
    the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
    for time spent in federal custody after the writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum
    was executed and before he was sentenced for violating 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1).
    Specifically, he seeks credit on his federal sentence for the period he spent in
    confinement from July 7, 1994, through December 7, 1994.
    Bailes was arrested in California for state parole violation on February 5,
    1994, for absconding, illegally possessing a firearm, and resisting arrest, and he
    was sentenced to one year of imprisonment. Based on these events, the United
    States charged Bailes with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of
    
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1). A writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum was issued for
    him to appear and answer the federal charges, and he was taken into federal
    custody on July 7, 1994. On December 8, 1994, Bailes was sentenced to seventy
    months' imprisonment and three years' supervised release. On January 27, 1995,
    Bailes was transferred to Colorado to begin serving his federal sentence. Bailes
    received credit on his state sentence for the time he spent in custody from
    February 5, 1994, through February 5, 1995, when his state sentence expired.
    It was originally determined that Bailes' federal sentence would begin on
    February 5, 1995, after his state sentence expired. However, on August 1, 1995,
    the Bureau of Prisons issued a nunc pro tunc order declaring that his federal
    sentence began on December 8, 1994, the date he was sentenced for violating §
    922(g)(1). Bailes challenges this determination, arguing his federal sentence
    -2-
    should be calculated from July 7, 1994, the date he was taken into federal custody
    pursuant to the writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. 1
    Bailes' argument ignores the plain language of 
    18 U.S.C. § 3585
    (b), which
    allows a defendant to receive credit for presentence confinement, but only for
    confinement "that has not been credited against another sentence." In analyzing
    this statute, the Supreme Court explained that "Congress made clear that a
    defendant could not receive double credit for his detention time." United States
    v. Wilson, 
    503 U.S. 329
    , 337 (1992). Bailes' presentence confinement from July
    7, 1994, through December 7, 1994, was credited against his state sentence. He
    may not receive credit on his federal sentence for this same confinement. See
    also United States v. Dennis, 
    926 F.2d 768
    , 769 (8th Cir. 1991).
    AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
    Entered for the Court
    Mary Beck Briscoe
    Circuit Judge
    1
    Bailes also argues his federal sentence should be credited with time spent in state
    custody between February 5, 1994, and July 7, 1994. However, he cites no authority and
    
    18 U.S.C. § 3585
    (b) clearly does not authorize such a result. Instead, § 3585(b) is
    intended to allow federal inmates to receive credit for federal presentence confinement on
    federal charges. Bailes was in state confinement for violating state law between February
    5, 1994, and July 7, 1994.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 97-1144

Filed Date: 10/10/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021