United States v. Cliffton S. Mormon , 602 F. App'x 506 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •           Case: 14-12134   Date Filed: 03/13/2015   Page: 1 of 8
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 14-12134
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00082-LSC-TMP-5
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    CLIFFTON S. MORMON,
    a.k.a. Kurt,
    a.k.a. Curt,
    a.k.a. Tippy,
    a.k.a. Tip,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Alabama
    ________________________
    (March 13, 2015)
    Case: 14-12134      Date Filed: 03/13/2015   Page: 2 of 8
    Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Cliffton Mormon appeals his sentence of 95 months of imprisonment for one
    count of conspiring to commit bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and two counts of
    aiding and abetting aggravated identity theft, 
    id. §§ 1028A,
    2. Mormon challenges
    the enhancement of his sentence for being an organizer or leader of a conspiracy to
    cash counterfeit checks; for an amount of loss exceeding $120,000; for having 50
    or more victims; and for using sophisticated means or, alternatively, for relocating
    to evade law enforcement. Mormon also challenges, for the first time, the
    requirement that he complete 24 hours of community service by washing dishes at
    a soup kitchen or similar facility as a special condition of his supervised release.
    We affirm the special condition of Mormon’s supervised release and all except one
    enhancement applied to Mormon. Because the record does not support the finding
    that Mormon’s offense involved 50 victims, we vacate his sentence and remand for
    the district court to resentence Mormon using the two-level enhancement applied
    to an offense involving 10 or more victims.
    The district court did not clearly err in finding that Mormon was an
    organizer or leader of the conspiracy. A defendant is subject to a four-level
    enhancement of his offense level if he was “an organizer or leader of a criminal
    activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive,” United
    2
    Case: 14-12134     Date Filed: 03/13/2015    Page: 3 of 8
    States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(a) (Nov. 2013), and if he exercised
    authority over “one or more other participants,” 
    id. § 3B1.1
    cmt. n.2. The factual
    proffer for Mormon’s pleas of guilty and the testimony at sentencing from John
    Bailey, an agent of the United States Postal Inspection Service, established that
    Mormon recruited a person to provide insider information about banking
    operations and that Mormon directed a counterfeit check-cashing operation that
    involved several persons. See 
    id. § 3B1.1
    cmt. n.4. Mormon persuaded his
    girlfriend, an employee of Regions Bank, to join the conspiracy and directed her to
    provide information about bank procedures, to access bank databases to determine
    which accounts at different banks to pilfer, and to print images of checks to
    counterfeit. Mormon also moved from Atlanta, Georgia, where the headquarters of
    the conspiracy was located, to Birmingham, Alabama, to supervise local
    operations; he produced counterfeit checks in his hotel room but conducted
    meetings at a coconspirator’s residence; he supervised coconspirators who
    recruited persons to cash the counterfeit checks; and he performed surveillance
    when the recruits entered banks to cash the counterfeit checks. The evidence
    supports the finding that Mormon orchestrated the activities of the Birmingham
    counterfeiting operation.
    The district court also did not clearly err in finding that the amount of loss
    attributable to Mormon exceeded $120,000. A defendant is responsible for
    3
    Case: 14-12134    Date Filed: 03/13/2015   Page: 4 of 8
    monetary losses that he causes and that result from the reasonably foreseeable acts
    of his coconspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy, 
    id. §§ 1B1.3(a)(1),
    2B1.1
    cmt n.3. When the monetary losses exceed $120,000, the defendant is subject to a
    ten-level enhancement of his offense level. 
    Id. § 2B1.1(b)(1)(F).
    Evidence
    introduced during Mormon’s change of plea and sentencing hearings established
    that officers in southern Georgia found Mormon in possession of check stock
    paper; stolen checks; partially completed and stubbed counterfeit checks connected
    to 27 business bank accounts; a computer containing check-writing software and
    data entries showing that $84,000 in checks had been printed; and 24 images of
    checks that each had a face value exceeding $1,000. The district court reasonably
    considered the value of the images of the checks and Mormon’s production
    capabilities to determine the amount of loss. See United States v. Grant, 
    431 F.3d 760
    , 765 (11th Cir. 2005); United States v. Wai-Keung, 
    115 F.3d 874
    , 877 (11th
    Cir. 1997). The district court also reasonably attributed to Mormon the value of
    counterfeit checks that his known coconspirators negotiated using stolen account
    information, some of which was discovered in Mormon’s hotel room and some of
    which corresponded to accounts located by his girlfriend. See United States v.
    Baldwin, 
    774 F.3d 711
    , 727–28 (11th Cir. 2014). Mormon’s coconspirators cashed
    $29,504 in counterfeit checks and attempted to cash more checks valuing $42,622
    at a Regions Bank; cashed $43,104 in counterfeit checks and attempted to cash
    4
    Case: 14-12134     Date Filed: 03/13/2015    Page: 5 of 8
    more checks valuing $58,081 at a Wells Fargo Bank; and cashed one counterfeit
    check for $1,981.37 and attempted to cash a second check for $1,393.75 at a
    BBVA Compass Bank. The value of the check images and of the checks that
    Mormon’s coconspirators negotiated or attempted to negotiate exceed $120,000.
    The district court clearly erred when it found that Mormon’s victims
    numbered at least 50. “[I]n a case involving a means of identification,” “any
    individual whose means of identification was used unlawfully or without
    authority” is a “victim.” U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 cmt. n.4(E). If there are 50 or more
    victims, a defendant is subject to a four-level increase in his offense level, 
    id. § 2B1.1(b)(2)(B),
    but a two-level increase applies to an offense involving 10 or
    more victims, 
    id. § 2B1.1(b)(2)(A).
    Mormon acknowledges that he “used” the
    means of identification of 3 banks and 18 account holders. Investigator Bailey
    testified that officers seized from Mormon a box containing 24 images of checks
    from different accounts, but the investigator testified that only two of those images
    were used to create “partially-completed counterfeit checks.” See United States v.
    Hall, 
    704 F.3d 1317
    , 1322 (11th Cir. 2013). Although Investigator Bailey testified
    that he and his team “reviewed hundreds of checks that were passed” by the
    conspiracy, the record is devoid of evidence that those checks were created using
    the means of identification of more than one individual or that those checks
    involved a victim different than those admitted to by Mormon. The government is
    5
    Case: 14-12134     Date Filed: 03/13/2015    Page: 6 of 8
    required to introduce “sufficient and reliable” evidence to identify the victims of an
    offense, see United States v. Washington, 
    714 F.3d 1358
    , 1361 (11th Cir. 2013),
    and that is particularly important in a case like this where the conspirators cashed
    several checks against the same accounts multiple times. Because the government
    identified, at most, 23 victims, the district court must resentence Mormon using the
    two-level enhancement applied to an offense involving 10 or more victims.
    Even if we were to assume that Mormon is not subject to a two-level
    increase in his base offense level for relocating the check-cashing operation to
    evade law enforcement officials, see U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(10)(A), the district court
    did not clearly err when it enhanced Mormon’s offense level on the alternative
    ground that he used sophisticated means, see 
    id. § 2B1.1(b)(10)(C).
    Mormon used
    especially complex or intricate conduct to execute the scheme and to conceal the
    counterfeit operation and his involvement in the operations. 
    Id. § 2B1.1
    cmt.
    n.9(B); see United States v. Ghertler, 
    605 F.3d 1256
    , 1267–68 (11th Cir. 2010). He
    determined which bank accounts to target and how much money to draw using
    confidential information that his girlfriend acquired about the check numbers and
    their amounts that had cleared to ensure that the counterfeit checks matched the
    pattern of activity of the accounts. Mormon also acquired images of real checks
    from which he copied account and routing numbers and other information that he
    used to create counterfeit checks of sufficient quality that they were accepted by
    6
    Case: 14-12134     Date Filed: 03/13/2015    Page: 7 of 8
    banks. And Mormon had coconspirators recruit persons to cash the checks; he
    concealed his identity and his base of operations from those recruits; and the
    recruits were ordinarily homeless or transient persons who were difficult to trace
    and were easily enticed to serve on a temporary basis in exchange for money or
    other things of value. The district court was entitled to find that Mormon’s scheme
    was sophisticated.
    The district court did not plainly err by ordering Mormon to complete 24
    hours of community service by washing dishes at a soup kitchen or similar facility
    during his supervised release. “Community service may be imposed as a condition
    of supervised release,” U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(e)(3); see also 
    id. § 5F1.3,
    and the district
    court reasonably determined that requiring Mormon to wash dishes enabled him to
    use that past employment to benefit others who were less privileged while teaching
    him the value of honest employment, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(d)(1), 3553(a). The
    district court found that Mormon’s fraud “demonstrate[d] an absolute callous
    disregard for [the] law, for people’s rights, [and] for the interest of others,” and the
    district court reasonably could have determined that Morman could best make
    amends by serving the persons whom he enticed to engage in criminal activities for
    his financial gain. Mormon argues that his term of community service involves a
    “greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary” to achieve the
    statutory goals of sentencing, 
    id. § 3583(d)(2),
    but the condition that Mormon
    7
    Case: 14-12134     Date Filed: 03/13/2015   Page: 8 of 8
    serve for “four hours per week for six weeks” is far below the maximum term of
    community service recommended by the advisory guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 5F1.3
    cmt. n.1. “[T]here can be no plain error where there is no precedent from the
    Supreme Court or this Court directly resolving it,” United States v. Lejarde-Rada,
    
    319 F.3d 1288
    , 1291 (11th Cir. 2003), and Mormon fails to cite any precedent
    holding that community service in the form of washing dishes for the length of one
    day is an excessive deprivation of liberty.
    We AFFIRM the special condition of Mormon’s supervised release and the
    enhancement of his sentence for being an organizer or leader of a conspiracy to
    cash counterfeit checks, for causing a loss of more than $120,000, and for his use
    of sophisticated means. But because the record does not support the finding that
    Mormon’s offense involved 50 victims, we VACATE his sentence and REMAND
    for the district court to resentence Mormon using the two-level enhancement
    applied to an offense involving 10 or more victims.
    8
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-12134

Citation Numbers: 602 F. App'x 506

Judges: Hull, Per Curiam, Pryor, Rosenbaum, William

Filed Date: 3/13/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024