United States v. Randy Bernard Bragg ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                 Case: 17-11913    Date Filed: 08/04/2017   Page: 1 of 2
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    _______________________
    No. 17-11913
    Non-Argument Calendar
    _______________________
    D.C. Docket No. 5:00-cr-00037-LJA-CHW-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff – Appellee,
    versus
    RANDY BERNARD BRAGG,
    Defendant – Appellant.
    _______________________
    Appeals from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Georgia
    _______________________
    (August 4, 2017)
    Before MARCUS, JORDAN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Following the Surpeme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.
    Ct. 2551 (2015), the district court vacated Randy Bragg’s 210-month sentence,
    Case: 17-11913    Date Filed: 08/04/2017   Page: 2 of 2
    which had been imposed under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. §
    924(e).   Because the ACCA no longer applied to Mr. Bragg, his maximum
    statutory sentence for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) was 10 years, and his advisory
    guideline range was 57-71 months.
    By the time of the resentencing hearing, Mr. Bragg had served
    approximately 198 months in prison – 78 months more than his maximum 10-year
    sentence. So both Mr. Bragg and the government asked the district court to impose
    a sentence at or below the 10-year maximum. The government told the district
    court that a sentence of time served (i.e., 198 months) would be illegal because it
    would exceed the 10-year maximum.
    The district court varied upward and imposed a sentence of time served.
    Because Mr. Bragg had served approximately 198 months in prison, the time-
    served sentence exceeded the 10-year maximum and constituted reversible error.
    We therefore vacate Mr. Bragg’s sentence and remand for resentencing. See, e.g.,
    United States v. Sanchez, 
    586 F.3d 918
    , 930 (11th Cir. 2009) (holding that sentence
    exceeding statutory maximum constituted plain error and required vacator). The
    district court shall impose a sentence at or below the 10-year statutory maximum.
    VACATED AND REMANDED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-11913 Non-Argument Calendar

Judges: Marcus, Jordan, Pryor

Filed Date: 8/4/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024