Southern Family Insurance Company v. United States , 476 F. App'x 228 ( 2012 )

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 17, 2012
No. 11-12269
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 8:05-cv-02158-JSM-MAP
SOUTHERN FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(May 17, 2012)
Before HULL, ANDERSON and HIGGINBOTHAM,* Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
_________________
*Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham, United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by
designation.
We have had the benefit of oral argument in this case, and have carefully
considered the briefs of the parties, the relevant cases, and relevant portions of the
record. After a bench trial, the district court made findings of fact with respect to
the five factors set out in United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co.,
412 U.S. 401, 93 S.Ct. 2169 (1973), including the ultimate finding that the intent
and motive of the transferor of the funds was a contribution to capital to benefit the
Florida insurance market, i.e., to encourage private insurance companies to invest
their capital in the Florida insurance market. The record contains ample evidence
to support these findings, including the testimony of virtually every witness, most
of whom were extremely knowledgeable not only with the relevant legal principles,
but also with the insurance industry. Even if there were some minimal component
which might be deemed payment for services, the same was negligible, and the
dominant intent and motivation was clearly the benefit to the public at large as
found by the district court.
We cannot conclude that the district court’s findings of fact were clearly
erroneous.
AFFIRMED.
2