United States v. Thomas Jason Strickland ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •            Case: 15-12734    Date Filed: 12/18/2015   Page: 1 of 3
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 15-12734
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-B-8
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    THOMAS JASON STRICKLAND,
    a.k.a. J-Red,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Alabama
    ________________________
    (December 18, 2015)
    Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Case: 15-12734        Date Filed: 12/18/2015        Page: 2 of 3
    Pursuant to a plea agreement, Thomas Jason Strickland pled guilty to
    conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21
    U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). The plea agreement contained a cooperation
    provision to be applied under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, Substantial Assistance to
    Authorities, and/or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), Reducing a
    Sentence for Substantial Assistance.1 Doc. 108 at 6-11. Paragraph 21, subsection
    g. of the agreement states that “[i]f the defendant’s efforts to cooperate with the
    United States does not amount to substantial assistance as determined solely by the
    United States, the United States agrees to recommend that the defendant receive a
    sentence at the low end of the advisory guideline range.” Doc. 108 at 9.
    At sentencing, the District Court determined that the applicable sentence
    range under the Sentencing Guidelines called for a prison sentence of 100 to 125
    months based on a total offense level of 27 and a criminal history category of IV.
    The minimum prison term the court could impose, however, was 120 months, see
    21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), because the conspiracy offense involved “at least
    50 grams of methamphetamine.” 
    Id. at 14.
    Therefore, under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1, the
    Guidelines sentence range became 120-125 months. 2 The Government, pursuant
    to paragraph 21, g. of the plea agreement, recommended a sentence at the low end
    1
    Rule 35(b) is inapplicable here. It authorizes the Government to move for a reduction
    of a sentence after its imposition.
    2
    U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(c) states, in pertinent part: “[T]he sentence may be imposed at any
    point within the applicable guideline range, provided that the sentence . . . (2) is not less than any
    statutorily required minimum sentence.
    2
    Case: 15-12734       Date Filed: 12/18/2015     Page: 3 of 3
    of the range, 120 months. Strickland argued that under the plea agreement, the
    Government had to recommend a sentence of 100 months. The District Court
    disagreed and sentenced Strickland to a prison term of 120 months.
    Strickland appeals his sentence, arguing that the Government breached the
    plea agreement by recommending a sentence of 120 months. We disagree.
    U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 allows the Government to move the District Court to
    depart from the Guidelines sentence range. Had the Government recommended a
    sentence of 100 months, the court could not have imposed it due to the statutory
    mandatory minimum of 120 months. 3
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) authorizes the Government to move the district court to impose a
    sentence below the statutory minimum. Strickland’s plea agreement did not call for the
    Government to file such a motion. In essence, Strickland wrongly contends that the Government
    should have filed a § 3553(e) motion.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-12734

Judges: Tjoflat, Hull, Marcus

Filed Date: 12/18/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024