Phyllis Allen v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , 473 F. App'x 879 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________                   FILED
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    No. 11-15759                    JUNE 19, 2012
    Non-Argument Calendar                JOHN LEY
    ________________________                CLERK
    D. C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-00743-WSD
    PHYLLIS ALLEN,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
    MCCALLA RAYMER, LLC,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    ________________________
    (June 19, 2012)
    Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    This is a civil action stemming from the allegedly wrongful foreclosure of
    residential property. The suit began in state court, and defendants removed the
    case to the District Court because it contained a claim under the Real Estate
    Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § § 2601 et seq., and gave the
    court subject matter jurisdiction. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1331
    . Defendants moved the
    district court to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim for relief.
    Plaintiff failed to respond to defendants’ motions to dismiss, as required by the
    District Court’s Local Rule 7.1. Then, following its independent review of the
    complaint’s allegations, the District Court found no merit in any of plaintiff’s
    claims and, in an order entered on March 31, 2011, granted defendants’ motions.
    Record, Vol. 1 at Tab 12.
    Ten days later, plaintiff moved the court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
    Procedure 60(b)(4) and (6) to set aside the court’s judgment for lack of subject
    matter jurisdiction and for leave to file a motion to remand. The District Court
    denied the motion in an order entered on November 7, 2011, 
    id.
     at Tab 12, and on
    December 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, appealing the District Court’s
    November 7, 2011 order denying her Rule 60(b)(4)(and (6) motion. 
    Id.
     at Tab 21.
    We find no error in the District Court’s November 7, 2011 order. It is
    therefore
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-15759

Citation Numbers: 473 F. App'x 879

Judges: Tjoflat, Jordan, Anderson

Filed Date: 6/19/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024