Miguel Beato v. United States ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •             Case: 11-14812    Date Filed: 07/19/2012       Page: 1 of 2
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 11-14812
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket Nos. 1:10-cv-21899-ASG ; 1:07cr-20224-ASG-1
    MIGUEL BEATO,
    llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllRespondent-Appellee.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    ________________________
    (July 19, 2012)
    Before MARCUS, MARTIN and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Miguel Beato appeals the denial of his motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C.
    Case: 11-14812   Date Filed: 07/19/2012   Page: 2 of 2
    § 2255. The sole question before us is whether, under the principles of Teague v.
    Lane, 
    489 U.S. 288
    , 
    109 S. Ct. 1060
     (1989), the Supreme Court’s decision in
    Padilla v. Kentucky, ___ U.S. ___, 
    130 S. Ct. 1473
     (2010), is retroactively
    applicable on collateral review, such that Beato’s motion to vacate is timely under
    
    28 U.S.C. § 2255
    (f)(3). According to Beato, the Supreme Court in Padilla
    established a new and “watershed” rule of criminal procedure. Teague, 
    489 U.S. at 311
    , 
    109 S. Ct. at 1076
    . Our recent decision in Figuereo-Sanchez v. United
    States, No. 10-14235, ___ F.3d ___, 
    2012 WL 1499871
     (11th Cir. May 1, 2012),
    forecloses this argument. See 
    id.
     at *3–6. We therefore affirm the judgment of the
    district court.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-14812

Filed Date: 7/19/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021