Joseph W. Blackburn v. John C. Calhoun ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
    ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    OCT 16, 2008
    No. 08-11982              THOMAS K. KAHN
    Non-Argument Calendar             CLERK
    ________________________
    D. C. Docket No. 07-00166-CV-BAE
    JOSEPH W. BLACKBURN,
    Representative Plaintiff and other
    persons similarly situated, the
    Plaintiff Class,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN C. CALHOUN,
    GEORGE R. FERNAMBUCQ,
    the Law Firm of Boyd, Fernambucq & Vincent, P.C.
    and its individual partners and/or shareholders,
    L. STEPHEN WRIGHT,
    the Law Firm of Najjar, Denaburg, P.C.
    and its individual partners and/or shareholders,
    CHARLES GORHAM,
    and the Law Firm of Gorham & Cason, L.L.C.
    and their individual partners and/or members,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Alabama
    _________________________
    (October 16, 2008)
    Before TJOFLAT, BIRCH and HULL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    This RICO1 action is rooted in an Alabama divorce suit. It was brought by
    the plaintiff more than four years after the decree dissolving his marriage was
    entered. The defendants are the judge who presided over the case, the lawyer who
    represented appellant, the lawyer who represented his then wife, another unrelated
    divorce lawyer, and their law firms.
    In a thoroughgoing order, record, vol. 3 at tab 73,the district court granted
    the judge summary judgment on the ground of judicial immunity, and dismissed
    the claims against the remaining defendants as barred by the statute of limitations.
    The court also denied plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend its judgment. Plaintiff
    now appeals.
    We agree for the reasons stated in the district court’s order that plaintiff’s
    claims were due to be dismissed.
    AFFIRMED.
    1
    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 
    18 U.S.C. § 1962
     et seq.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-11982

Judges: Tjoflat, Birch, Hull

Filed Date: 10/16/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024