United States v. Tommie J. Quinn , 281 F. App'x 871 ( 2008 )

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 11, 2008
No. 07-15094 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 07-00085-CR-ORL-28-DAB
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff–Appellee,
versus
TOMMIE J. QUINN,
a.k.a. The Stik,
Defendant–Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(June 11, 2008)
Before BIRCH, DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Tommie J. Quinn appeals his 210-month sentence for receiving and
distributing child pornography materials, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2),
(b)(1). On appeal, Quinn argues that his sentence was unreasonable because the
district court failed to adequately consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Quinn
contends that the court focused primarily on one § 3553(a) factor, the nature and
circumstances of his offense, without also considering that he had not committed
any crimes in the year prior to his self-surrender, that the doctor who examined
him opined that he was not a pedophile, and that he had a history of depression.
After careful review, we find that Quinn’s sentence was both procedurally
and substantively reasonable. Gall v. United States, __ U.S. __, 128 S. Ct. 586,
597–98, 169 L. Ed. 2d 445 (2007); United States v. Agbai, 497 F.3d 1226, 1229
(11th Cir. 2007). The court correctly calculated the Guidelines’ range and
expressly stated that it had considered the § 3553(a) factors. Furthermore, in
imposing the 120-month sentence—at the low end of the Guidelines’ range—the
court provided a reasoned basis for imposing Quinn’s sentence. Thus, we affirm
Quinn’s sentence.
AFFIRMED.
2