United States v. Michael Burgess , 471 F. App'x 860 ( 2012 )

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 7, 2012
No. 11-15828
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00161-ACC-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 7, 2012)
Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Sean M. Wagner, counsel for Michael Frank Burgess in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burgess’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Burgess’s motion for leave to file a pro
se supplemental brief is DENIED.
2