Case: 18-13692 Date Filed: 08/28/2019 Page: 1 of 6
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-13692
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00262-JA-TBS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VIKTORIYA JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 28, 2019)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 18-13692 Date Filed: 08/28/2019 Page: 2 of 6
Viktoriya Johnson appeals her convictions for conspiracy to commit wire
fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and for wire fraud,
id. § 1343. Johnson’s convictions
arose from her role in a conspiracy to defraud real estate investors by conning them
into paying for income-producing real estate and misappropriating their money
through a Ponzi scheme. Johnson challenges the denial of her motion for a
judgment of acquittal, in which she argued that she lacked actual knowledge of the
scheme to defraud. Johnson also argues, for the first time, that she was entitled to
an acquittal because the government failed to prove its alternative theory that she
acted with deliberate ignorance. We affirm.
We apply two standards of review in this appeal. We review the denial of a
motion for a judgment of acquittal de novo and draw all inferences from the
evidence in favor of the government. United States v. Rutgerson,
822 F.3d 1223,
1231 (11th Cir. 2016). “We are required to affirm [a] conviction if any rational trier
of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable
doubt.”
Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
Knowledge is an element of conspiracy and of wire fraud. A defendant is
guilty of conspiracy if she joined the conspiracy voluntarily with general
knowledge of its objective. United States v. Moran,
778 F.3d 942, 960 (11th Cir.
2015). Circumstantial evidence suffices to prove knowledge when the defendant’s
“presence at the scene of conspiratorial activity [makes it] so obvious that
2
Case: 18-13692 Date Filed: 08/28/2019 Page: 3 of 6
knowledge of its character can fairly be attributed to [her].”
Id. at 960–61. A
defendant commits wire fraud if she knowingly participates in a scheme to defraud
and uses or causes the use of the interstate wires in furtherance of the scheme.
United States v. Maxwell,
579 F.3d 1282, 1299 (11th Cir. 2009). A defendant acts
knowingly whether she “act[s] only with positive knowledge . . . [or she] act[s]
with an awareness of the high probability of the existence of the fact in question.”
United States v. Rivera,
944 F.2d 1563, 1570 (11th Cir. 1991). Knowledge can be
proved with evidence of actual knowledge or of deliberate ignorance. United States
v. Prather,
205 F.3d 1265, 1270 (11th Cir. 2000).
When a defendant testifies in her defense, the jury may disbelieve her
testimony and consider it as substantive evidence of her guilt. United States v.
Brown,
53 F.3d 312, 314 (11th Cir. 1995). By choosing to testify, the defendant
“runs the risk that if disbelieved the jury might conclude the opposite of [her]
testimony is true.”
Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). “At least
where some corroborative evidence of guilt exists for the charged offense . . . and
the defendant takes the stand in [her] own defense, [her] testimony, denying guilt,
may establish, by itself, elements of the offense.”
Id. at 314–15. That “rule applies
with special force where . . . [the government must prove] the defendant’s intent or
knowledge . . . .”
Id. at 315.
3
Case: 18-13692 Date Filed: 08/28/2019 Page: 4 of 6
Ample evidence proved that Johnson had actual knowledge of the scheme to
defraud real estate investors, so we need not address the alternative theory of
deliberate ignorance. Testimony from Johnson’s secretaries, her victims, and
federal investigators and copies of bank statements, emails, checks, and bogus real
estate documents proved that Johnson knew that the company she formed and
managed, Golden Investment Realty, Inc., operated a Ponzi scheme in which she
and her boyfriend, Leone Alfano La Cava, misappropriated millions of dollars
wired to them by 83 real estate investors and paid them a pittance in rental income.
After Alfano conned investors in Italy, Johnson executed their scheme to
defraud in Florida. She served as president of Golden Investment, managed its
daily operations, opened and served as the sole signatory on its bank accounts,
performed its bookkeeping, and supervised and paid office staff. See United States
v. Odoni,
782 F.3d 1226, 1232 (11th Cir. 2015) (“A jury could infer Odoni knew
the fraudulent nature of the operation because he was a central part of it . . .”);
Moran, 778 F.3d at 961–62. As president of Golden Investment, Johnson signed
contracts and quickclaim deeds for residential and commercial properties that were
either fictitious or were owned by other persons. See United States v. Gaines,
690
F.2d 849, 853–54 (11th Cir. 1982) (concluding a jury may infer knowledge from
the defendant’s signature on paperwork).
4
Case: 18-13692 Date Filed: 08/28/2019 Page: 5 of 6
Johnson misappropriated more than $1.3 million of investors’ money. She
accepted payments wired directly to her personal bank account and transferred
money from company accounts to her personal accounts. She wrote checks on
company accounts for cash, which her secretaries used to purchase cashier’s
checks, and she wrote large checks on which she referenced her spa, even after it
closed. Johnson also made checks payable to her secretaries and instructed them to
cash the checks and to send the money to her and to her relatives using Western
Union wire transfers. Shortly after receiving large payments, Johnson purchased a
spa for $250,000, her home, three rental properties, and $927,000 in luxury items,
including expensive automobiles.
Johnson also incriminated herself. When confronted by one investor bearing
a receipt for a wire transfer to her bank account, Johnson became “very nervous,”
dodged into her office, and then fled from the building. See United States v.
Blakey,
960 F.2d 996, 1000–01 (11th Cir. 1992) (recognizing flight suggested a
conspirator’s consciousness of guilt). Later, after a federal agent told Johnson that
all her properties were acquired with stolen money, she responded, “not
everything.” When questioned by the agent, Johnson falsely denied serving as the
president of Golden Investment. And Johnson’s implausible testimony at trial
“added further weight to the prosecution’s case.” See United States v. Margarita
Garcia,
906 F.3d 1255, 1274 (11th Cir. 2018), cert. denied sub nom. Garcia v.
5
Case: 18-13692 Date Filed: 08/28/2019 Page: 6 of 6
United States,
139 S. Ct. 2027 (2019). Although Johnson testified that she was a
“glorified secretary” for her coconspirator and was unaware of the scheme to
defraud, the jury discredited her testimony. See
Brown, 53 F.3d at 314–15; see
Margarita
Garcia, 906 F.3d at 1274 (“An explanation or denial offered by a
defendant at trial that the jury finds implausible or false may ‘form a sufficient
basis to allow the jury to find that the defendant had the requisite guilty
knowledge.’”).
We AFFIRM Johnson’s convictions.
6
