Kelvin Scott Ramirez v. U.S. Attorney General ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •            Case: 16-13164   Date Filed: 04/28/2017   Page: 1 of 3
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 16-13164
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    Agency No. A206-142750
    KELVIN SCOTT RAMIREZ,
    Petitioner,
    versus
    U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
    Respondent.
    ________________________
    Petition for Review of a Decision of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    ________________________
    (April 28, 2017)
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Case: 16-13164     Date Filed: 04/28/2017    Page: 2 of 3
    Kelvin Scott Ramirez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review
    of an order affirming the denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of
    removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act and the United Nations
    Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment
    or Punishment. 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(b), 1231(b)(3). The Board of Immigration
    Appeals affirmed the findings of an immigration judge that Ramirez failed to
    “establish[] a nexus between any past or future harm and an enumerated ground”;
    that his “fear of returning to Honduras . . . based on general conditions of criminal
    violence and civil unrest . . . are not cognizable grounds for asylum”; and that he
    submitted no evidence that “a Honduran official would acquiesce in any torture
    inflicted upon [Ramirez] by gang members.” We deny in part and dismiss in part
    Ramirez’s petition.
    Ramirez’s challenge to the finding that he is ineligible for asylum fails. To
    qualify for asylum, Ramirez had to prove that he was unable or unwilling to return
    to Honduras “on account of . . . [his] membership in a particular social group.” 8
    U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A). The immigration judge credited Ramirez’s testimony
    about being harassed and abducted by members of a gang to collect extortion
    payments and to recruit him to join the gang. Ramirez contends that he is part of a
    social group of victims of crime, but crime victims are not a social group protected
    by the Act. “Evidence that either is consistent with acts of private violence or the
    2
    Case: 16-13164     Date Filed: 04/28/2017    Page: 3 of 3
    petitioner’s failure to cooperate with guerillas, or that merely shows that a person
    has been the victim of criminal activity, does not constitute evidence of persecution
    based on a statutorily protected ground.” Rodriguez v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 
    735 F.3d 1302
    , 1310 (11th Cir. 2013) (brackets omitted) (quoting Ruiz v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,
    
    440 F.3d 1247
    , 1258 (11th Cir. 2006)). We deny Ramirez’s petition to the extent
    that he challenges the denial of asylum relief.
    We lack jurisdiction to review whether Ramirez was entitled to relief under
    the Convention. Ramirez did not challenge the denial of relief in his appeal to the
    Board. “We lack jurisdiction to consider a claim raised in a petition for review
    unless the petitioner has exhausted his administrative remedies with respect
    thereto,” even if the Board sua sponte addresses the issue. Amaya–Artunduaga v.
    U.S. Att’y Gen., 
    463 F.3d 1247
    , 1250 (11th Cir. 2006). We dismiss this part of
    Ramirez’s petition.
    PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-13164 Non-Argument Calendar

Judges: Pryor, Martin, Anderson

Filed Date: 4/28/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024