Trina Carlson v. Marc E. Bosem ( 2008 )

PER CURIAM:

Having thorough reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and having heard oral argument by counsel, we find no abuse of discretion. Therefore, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 1

1

. During the course of oral argument, appellee's counsel indicated that the payment of $13,846.95 in fees and costs associated with Carlson’s motion for sanctions arising out of the depositions (both initial and rescheduled) of Dr. Bosem ordered by the district court (DE 146; DE 209 and DE 211) had not yet been made and that that debt remained unsatisfied. Accordingly, this affirmance should not be construed as in any manner limiting, restricting or- depriving Carlson of the ability to further petition or move the district court for any available remedy relating to that matter.