Nationwide-Southeast, Inc. v. American Interstate Insurance , 270 F. App'x 781 ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                                                                       [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FILED
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ________________________   ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    MARCH 19, 2008
    THOMAS K. KAHN
    No. 07-13176
    CLERK
    ________________________
    D. C. Docket No. 05-03248-CV-TCB-1
    NATIONWIDE-SOUTHEAST, INC.,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    AMERICAN INTERSTATE INSURANCE CO.,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    _________________________
    (March 19, 2008)
    Before HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and EDENFIELD,* District Judge.
    PER CURIAM:
    *
    Honorable B. Avant Edenfield, United States District Judge for the Southern District of
    Georgia, sitting by designation.
    After review and oral argument, we affirm the district court’s June 18, 2007
    order granting summary judgment to defendant American Interstate Insurance Co.
    (“American Interstate”). Nationwide-Southeast’s (“Nationwide”) claims are barred
    by the doctrine of res judicata, as they were compulsory counterclaims in
    American Interstate’s 2004 state action to recover premiums. See Johnson v. First
    Carolina Fin. Corp., 
    200 Ga. App. 340
    , 341, 
    408 S.E.2d 151
    , 153 (1991) (finding
    that res judicata bars the filing of claims which should have been pled as
    compulsory counterclaims in a prior suit). The claims brought by Nationwide in
    this action are “logically related” to the claims asserted in American Interstate’s
    2004 action, and arise out of the same “transaction or occurrence.” See P & J
    Truck Lines, Inc. v. Canal Ins. Co., 
    148 Ga. App. 3
    , 4, 
    251 S.E.2d 72
    , 73 (1978);
    
    Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-13
    (a) (providing that a counterclaim is compulsory “if it
    arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing
    party’s claim. . . .”); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Welch, 
    259 Ga. App. 71
    , 73, 
    576 S.E.2d 57
    , 59 (2003) (“Any claim that is logically related to another claim that is being
    sued on is properly the basis for a compulsory counterclaim.”).
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-13176

Citation Numbers: 270 F. App'x 781

Judges: Hull, Wilson, Edenfield

Filed Date: 3/19/2008

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024