United States v. Michael D. James , 250 F. App'x 939 ( 2007 )

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
October 11, 2007
No. 07-12486 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00233-CR-WS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL D. JAMES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(October 11, 2007)
Before BLACK, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael D. James in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and James’s revocation of
supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2