Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    FILED
    _____________            U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    SEPTEMBER 14, 2010
    No. 10-10193
    Non-Argument Calendar               JOHN LEY
    CLERK
    _____________
    D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-00079-AAA-JEG
    EDWARD P. MANTURUCK,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    RICHARD M. MEEKS, Georgia State
    Trooper,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    __________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Georgia
    __________________________
    (September 14, 2010)
    Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the
    district court correctly dismissed the complaint.
    The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not
    meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 
    610 F.3d 701
     (11th Cir. 2010).
    Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the
    complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-10193

Filed Date: 9/14/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021