West Alabama Women's Center v. Thomas M. Miller ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                                        [PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 16-17296
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cv-00497-MHT-TFM
    WEST ALABAMA WOMEN’S CENTER,
    on behalf of themselves and their patients,
    WILLIAM J. PARKER,
    M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients,
    ALABAMA WOMEN’S CENTER,
    YASHICA ROBINSON WHITE,
    Plaintiffs-Appellees,
    versus
    DONALD E. WILLIAMSON,
    in his official capacity as State Health Officer, et al.,
    Defendant,
    THOMAS M. MILLER,
    Dr., in his official capacity as State Health Officer,
    LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, in his official capacity as
    Alabama Attorney General,
    LYN HEAD,
    in her official capacity as District Attorney for
    Tuscaloosa County,
    ROBERT L. BROUSSARD,
    in his official capacity as District Attorney for Madison County,
    Defendants-Appellants.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Alabama
    ________________________
    Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and ABRAMS,*
    District Judge.
    PER CURIAM:
    This is an appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction that was issued
    on October 27, 2016 and was last amended on November 22, 2016. W. Ala.
    Women’s Ctr. v. Miller, 
    217 F. Supp. 3d 1313
    (M.D. Ala. 2016). The appeal was
    scheduled to be orally argued before this Court at 9:00 a.m. on Friday morning,
    October 27, 2017. At approximately 12:30 p.m. on Thursday afternoon, October
    26, 2017, the district court issued a permanent injunction, accompanied by a 148-
    page opinion, and it entered final judgment in the case. As a result, this appeal is
    moot. See Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 
    527 U.S. 308
    , 315, 
    119 S. Ct. 1961
    , 1966 (1999) (“Generally, an appeal from the grant
    of a preliminary injunction becomes moot when the trial court enters a permanent
    injunction, because the former merges into the latter.”); Cone Corp. v.
    Hillsborough Cty., 
    908 F.2d 908
    , 912 n.5 (11th Cir. 1990) (collecting cases) (“The
    County’s challenge to the issuance of the preliminary injunction is moot regardless
    *
    Honorable Leslie Joyce Abrams, United States District Judge for the Middle District of
    Georgia, sitting by designation.
    of our disposition of this case on its merits because a permanent injunction has
    issued.”).
    APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-17296

Judges: Carnes, Dubina, Abrams

Filed Date: 10/30/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024