United States v. Jose Vera-Lopez ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________                  FILED
    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 09-15934                ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    JUNE 16, 2010
    Non-Argument Calendar
    JOHN LEY
    ________________________
    CLERK
    D. C. Docket No. 09-00289-CR-01-TCB-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    versus
    JOSE VERA-LOPEZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    _________________________
    (June 16, 2010)
    Before BLACK, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Jose Vera-Lopez appeals his 24-month sentence imposed following his
    guilty plea to illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (a). Vera-Lopez argues his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light
    of the 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a) factors because it is greater than necessary to serve the
    goals of sentencing. After review, we affirm Vera-Lopez’s sentence.1
    The party challenging the sentence has the burden of showing it is
    unreasonable in light of the record and the § 3553(a) factors. United States v.
    Talley, 
    431 F.3d 784
    , 788 (11th Cir. 2005). We “recognize that there is a range of
    reasonable sentences from which the district court may choose,” and we ordinarily
    expect a sentence within the defendant’s advisory guideline range to be reasonable.
    
    Id.
     “We will defer to the district court’s judgment regarding the weight given to
    the § 3553(a) factors unless the district court has made a clear error of judgment.”
    United States v. Gonzalez, 
    550 F.3d 1319
    , 1324 (11th Cir. 2008) (quotation
    omitted), cert. denied, 
    129 S. Ct. 2848
     (2009).
    In this case, Vera-Lopez’s sentence was substantively reasonable. Given
    Vera-Lopez’s history of immigration violations, the sentence reflects Vera-Lopez’s
    history and characteristics, promotes respect for the law, and deters Vera-Lopez
    from committing additional immigration offenses. The sentence also deters others
    1
    We review a sentence imposed by a district court for reasonableness, using an
    abuse-of-discretion standard. United States v. Livesay, 
    587 F.3d 1274
    , 1278 (11th Cir. 2009).
    2
    from committing the crime of illegal reentry. Finally, Vera-Lopez’s sentence is
    within his guideline range, which we ordinarily expect to be reasonable, and is
    substantially below the ten-year statutory maximum sentence. Because the district
    court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Vera-Lopez to a term of 24 months’
    imprisonment, we affirm.
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-15934

Filed Date: 6/16/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021