William Long v. Holly Benson ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT            FILED
    ________________________ U.S. COURT  OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    JUNE 22, 2010
    No. 08-16261
    JOHN LEY
    ________________________
    CLERK
    D. C. Docket No. 08-00026-CV-4-RH-WCS
    WILLIAM LONG,
    on behalf of themselves and all
    others similarly situated,
    CHARLES TODD LEE,
    on behalf of themselves and all
    others similarly situated,
    et al.,
    Plaintiffs-Appellees,
    versus
    HOLLY BENSON,
    in her official capacity as Secretary
    Florida Agency for Health Care Administration,
    DOUGLAS BEACH,
    in his official capacity as Secretary
    Florida Department of Elder Affairs,
    et al.,
    Defendants-Appellants.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Florida
    _________________________
    (June 22, 2010)
    Before EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and HODGES,* District
    Judge.
    PER CURIAM:
    This appeal is from the grant of a preliminary injunction. As we understand
    it, today's case presents a close question in the application of law to a set of unique
    facts. We are not deciding the merits of the case. But we cannot say the district
    court abused its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction in this case. "A
    preliminary injunction may be issued to protect the plaintiff from irreparable injury
    and to preserve the district court's power to render a meaningful decision after a
    trial on the merits. The grant or denial of a preliminary injunction rests in the
    discretion of the district court." Canal Authority of State of Fla. v. Callaway, 489
    *
    Honorable Wm. Terrell Hodges, United States District Judge for the Middle District of
    Florida, sitting by designation.
    
    2 F.2d 567
    , 572 (5th Cir. 1974). See also Schiavo v. Schiavo, 
    403 F.3d 1223
    , 1226
    (11th Cir. 2005); Revette v. Int'l Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron
    Workers, 
    740 F.2d 892
    , 893 (11th Cir. 1984).
    Today's affirmance of the preliminary injunction does not affect the law of
    the case on the merits. A full review of appellants' assertions can be had after --
    and if -- the district court on full consideration decides to grant a permanent
    injunction.
    AFFIRMED.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-16261

Judges: Edmondson, Birch, Hodges

Filed Date: 6/22/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024