Bank of America, N.A. v. Lakhani (In Re Lakhani) , 583 F. App'x 896 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •            Case: 14-12749   Date Filed: 11/19/2014    Page: 1 of 2
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ___________________________
    No. 14-12749
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ___________________________
    Docket No. 1:14-cv-00461-AT,
    Bkcy No. 13-bkc-72472-WLH
    In re: NASRUDDIN LAKHANI,
    Debtor.
    __________________________________________________________________
    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    versus
    NASRUDDIN LAKHANI,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    ______________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Georgia
    _______________________________
    (November 19, 2014)
    Case: 14-12749     Date Filed: 11/19/2014   Page: 2 of 2
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Bank of America, N.A. appeals the district court’s summary affirmance of
    the bankruptcy court’s order voiding a wholly unsecured second priority lien on
    residential property owned by a Chapter 7 debtor.
    The bankruptcy court granted Debtor’s request to “strip off” the unsecured
    junior lien, based on this Court’s binding precedent in McNeal v. GMAC Mortg.,
    LLC (In re McNeal), 
    735 F.3d 1263
     (11th Cir. 2012) (citing Folendore v. United
    States Small Bus. Admin. (In re Folendore), 
    862 F.2d 1537
     (11th Cir. 1989)). In
    McNeal, we concluded that a Chapter 7 debtor is allowed to “strip off” a second
    priority lien on his home, pursuant to 
    11 U.S.C. § 506
    (a) and (d), when the first
    priority lien exceeds the value of the property.
    Bank of America acknowledges that this panel is bound by the Court’s
    decisions in McNeal and Folendore but reserves the right to seek reconsideration
    of the issue by the en banc Court. Cf. United States v. Smith, 
    122 F.3d 1355
    , 1359
    (11th Cir. 1997) (“Under the prior panel precedent rule, we are bound by earlier
    panel holdings . . . unless and until they are overruled en banc or by the Supreme
    Court.”).
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-12749

Citation Numbers: 583 F. App'x 896

Judges: Pryor, Anderson, Edmondson

Filed Date: 11/19/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024