United States v. Jovan Demetrius Fredericks ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •            Case: 19-13576   Date Filed: 05/26/2020   Page: 1 of 4
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
    ________________________
    No. 19-13576
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ________________________
    D.C. Docket No. 5:18-cr-00048-JDW-PRL-1
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JOVAN DEMETRIUS FREDERICKS,
    a.k.a. Jovan D. Fredericks,
    Defendant - Appellant.
    ________________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Middle District of Florida
    ________________________
    (May 26, 2020)
    Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    Case: 19-13576     Date Filed: 05/26/2020   Page: 2 of 4
    Jovan Demetrius Fredericks appeals his convictions for being a felon in
    possession of a firearm, for possessing narcotics with the intent to distribute, and
    for possessing a firearm during and in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 922
    (g)(1), 924(e), 924(c)(1)(A)(i); 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C).
    Fredericks appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. He argues that the officers
    violated his right to be free from an unlawful seizure under the Fourth Amendment
    when they exceeded their authority to conduct an investigatory stop and arrested
    him without probable cause or a warrant. We affirm.
    We review the denial of a motion to suppress evidence as a mixed question
    of law and fact. United States v. Perez, 
    443 F.3d 772
    , 774 (11th Cir. 2006). We
    review rulings of law de novo and related findings of fact for clear error. 
    Id.
    The district court did not err by denying Fredericks’s motion to suppress. As
    Officer Erik Cabrales of the Ocala Police Department and Officer Rodriguez
    patrolled an apartment complex known for violence and drug sales, they observed
    Fredericks sitting outside holding a cigarette that had been hand-rolled in brown
    paper. Cabrales noticed Fredericks was partially concealing the brown, hand-rolled
    cigarette in the palm of his left hand. So he asked Fredericks what he had in his
    hand, but Fredericks did not respond. Cabrales asked again, and Fredericks
    displayed a cigarette lighter in his other hand but continued to conceal the
    cigarette. The district court found after viewing body-camera video from the
    2
    Case: 19-13576     Date Filed: 05/26/2020   Page: 3 of 4
    officers that Cabrales then told Fredericks, “I see what you got in your hand, Man.
    I could see it from where I was at.” At this point, the officers “ha[d] a reasonable,
    articulable suspicion that criminal activity [was] afoot,” Illinois v. Wardlow, 
    528 U.S. 119
    , 123 (2000), and could detain Fredericks to investigate.
    Cabrales asked Fredericks to stand up. But when Fredericks stood, he
    abruptly reached behind his back with his hand that was holding the cigarette.
    Cabrales grabbed Fredericks’s arm to prevent him from reaching behind his back.
    As Cabrales did so, he felt a bulge on Fredericks’s right hip, which he suspected
    was a firearm. Cabrales immediately advised Rodriguez, “He’s got a gun on him.”
    For their safety, the officers placed Fredericks in handcuffs before removing the
    concealed firearm from Fredericks’s waist. The officers had the right to handcuff
    Fredericks to ensure their safety and to complete their investigation. Cabrales also
    had probable cause to arrest Fredericks based on the firearm concealed under
    Fredericks’s shirt. See 
    Fla. Stat. § 790.01
    (2) (“A person who carries a concealed
    firearm on or about his or her person commits a felony of the third degree”); 
    Fla. Stat. § 790.001
    (2) (defining “concealed firearm” as “any firearm . . . which is
    carried on or about a person in such a manner as to conceal the firearm from the
    ordinary sight of another person”). As the officers escorted Fredericks to a patrol
    car, he tugged repeatedly at a pocket, from which the officers had the right to seize
    3
    Case: 19-13576       Date Filed: 05/26/2020       Page: 4 of 4
    a black pouch containing methylenedioxymethamphetamine,1 marijuana, cocaine,
    and heroin.
    We AFFIRM Fredericks’s convictions.
    1
    After the incident, law enforcement tested the substance in the cigarette Fredericks was
    holding when Cabrales and Rodriguez encountered him. It also contained methylenedioxy
    methamphetamine.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-13576

Filed Date: 5/26/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/26/2020