Torrie Austin v. United States ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • USCA11 Case: 22-13829    Document: 11-1     Date Filed: 06/23/2023   Page: 1 of 2
    [DO NOT PUBLISH]
    In the
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eleventh Circuit
    ____________________
    No. 22-13829
    Non-Argument Calendar
    ____________________
    TORRIE CHERMAINE AUSTIN,
    Petitioner-Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    ____________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Florida
    D.C. Docket No. 2:21-cv-14270-RLR
    ____________________
    USCA11 Case: 22-13829          Document: 11-1         Date Filed: 06/23/2023           Page: 2 of 2
    2                           Opinion of the Court                        22-13829
    Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:
    This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
    tion. We previously construed Mr. Austin’s October 2022 motion
    for a certificate of appealability as a notice of appeal from the dis-
    trict court’s July 29, 2022 final judgment and remanded to the dis-
    trict court for the limited purpose of determining whether the ap-
    peal period should be reopened under Federal Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 4(a)(6). 1 The construed notice of appeal is untimely to
    challenge the final judgment, as it was filed after the statutory dead-
    line, and the district court declined to reopen the appeal period on
    limited remand. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (a)(6), (c)(1); Green
    v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 
    606 F.3d 1296
    , 1300-01 (11th Cir. 2010); see also
    Daniels v. United States, 
    809 F.3d 588
    , 589 (11th Cir. 2015). Accord-
    ingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal.
    No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
    with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
    other applicable rules.
    1 The original notice of appeal evinced an intent to appeal from the
    district court’s October 31, 2022 order denying Mr. Austin’s motion for a cer-
    tificate of appealability but an appeal from a district court’s denial of a certifi-
    cate of appealability is procedurally improper. See Pruitt v. United States, 
    274 F.3d 1315
    , 1319 (11th Cir. 2001); see also 
    28 U.S.C. § 2253
    (c)(1); Edwards v.
    United States, 
    114 F.3d 1083
    , 1084 (11th Cir. 1997).